|
recent additions:
Mijailovich SM, Kojic M, Zivkovic M, Fabry B, Fredberg JJ. A finite element
model of cell deformation during magnetic bead twisting. J Appl
Physiol 93:1429-1436, 2002
PDF-version (816 KB)
Butler JP, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Fabry B, Fredber JJ. Traction fields,
moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings. Am
J Physiol Cell Physiol 282:C595C605, 2002.
PDF-version (608 KB) |
| Magnetic
Twisting Cytometry |
Magnetic twisting cytometry (MTC) was developed at the
Physiology Program
of the Harvard School of Public
Health. Using MTC, controlled mechanical stresses can be applied to specific
cell surface receptors using ligand-coated ferromagnetic beads. MTC can:
-
apply controlled mechanical stress to cells;
-
assay for ligand-receptor adhesion strength;
-
assay for mechanical linkages between a cell surface receptor and the
cytoskeleton;
-
assay for the mechanical (rheological) properties of the cytoskeleton (such
as stiffness or shear modulus, viscosity, and motility); and
-
assay for intracellular biochemical changes such as remodeling of the
cytoskeleton.
Applying mechanical forces and stresses to cells, (in order to measure cellular
mechanics, or cell rheology) using magnetic beads is a surprisingly old idea,
dating back to the beginning of the 20th century.
Magnetic
dragging and twisting was put on a solid scientific ground first by Francis
H.C. Crick. (He is better known for his pioneering efforts to determine the
three-dimensional structures of large molecules found in living organisms,
however, during World War II, Crick worked as a physicist in the development
of magnetic mines for use in naval warfare). His paper (together with A.
F. W. Hughes) "The physical properties of cytoplasm" in Experimental
Cell Research,1:37-80 and "The physical properties of cytoplasm.
A study by means of the magnetic particle method. Part II. Theoretical treatment"
in Experimental Cell Research,1:505-533 are still essential
reading for cell rheology researchers.
 For about
20 years following Crick's work, nothing noteworthy (to my knowledge) happened
in the field of magnetic twisting (or pulling) cytometry. Things changed
in the early 1970th when researchers around Joe Brain at the Harvard School
of Public Health and David Cohen from the Francis Bitter Magnetic Laboratory
(MIT) got interested in the clearance ability of lung macrophages. They let
animals inhale aerosolated ferromagnetic particles, magnetized the particles
with a brief magnetic pulse of high intensity, and then measured the magnetic
signal decaying over time. This signal decay was interpreted as a result
of the phagocytic activity of lung macrophages: The faster the macrophages
internalized the foreign magnetic particles, the faster the particles' magnetic
orientation would become randomized.
 When Peter
Valberg and later Jim Butler, both accomplished physicists, arrived at the
Harvard School of Public Health, they invented Magnetic Twisting Cytometry
to study the mechanical properties and motility of pulmonary macrophages:
ferromagnetic particles got "eaten" by a small sample of macrophages, then
the particles where magnetized and subsequently twisted in a homogeneous
magnetic field. Depending on the macrophages' rheological properties, the
magnetic particles rotated faster or slower. This rotation was measured with
sensitive fluxgate-magnetometers. Measuring the particles' small magnetic
field (on the order of 1 nTesla) in the presence of a large twisting
field (of about 5 mTesla) and magnetic noise from the environment is a formidable
engineering problem. Valberg used multiple layers of mu-metal shielding and
spun the macrophages in order to use lock-in-amplification of the small
magnetic signals.
What if
one wants to measure the mechanical properties of cells that do not phagocytose
the magnetic beads? The answer is to "glue" the ferromagnetic beads to the
cell surface. To this end, Ning Wang from the Harvard School of Public Health
and Donald Ingber of Children's Hospital coated the particles with ligands
for specific surface receptors. Now almost any cell type could be measured,
and moreover the mechanical linkage between the receptor and the cytoskeleton
could be probed. Using a computer-controlled machine, it is now possible
to continuously measure cell rheology (shear modulus or stiffness, viscosity,
motility) over a wide range of frequencies (now between 0.01 and 1000
Hz).
 |

magnetic bead attached to an airway smooth muscle cell

fibroblast on a square pattern
|