According to a new report from the Harvard University-wide Center for the Developing Child, the answers lie at hand, thanks to four decades of program evaluation evidence and a remarkable convergence of new scientific knowledge about the developing brain, the human genome, and the impact of early childhood experiences on later learning, behavior, and health. Today’s policymakers have unprecedented opportunities to change life prospects for children at high risk for problems ranging from school failure and depression to cardiovascular disease and substance abuse.
The report, A Science-Based Frame-work for Early Childhood Policy,* “will help public- and private-sector leaders make wise investments in our nation’s future,” says Center Director Jack P. Shonkoff, a principal author and the Julius B. Richmond FAMRI Professor of Child Health and Development at Harvard’s School of Public Health (HSPH) and Graduate School of Education.
Prepared in response to policymakers’ requests, the report was released in August in Boston, with bipartisan participation at the Annual Meeting of the National Conference of State Legislatures.
The new report integrates research findings in neuro-science with evaluations of various early childhood services, including home visits, child care, and pre-school programs. After summarizing the scientific principles underlying early brain development, the report identifies “effectiveness factors” associated with programs that measurably benefit kids. Among these factors are basic medical care for pregnant women and young children, and environmental policies that reduce levels of known neurotoxins to protect the developing brain.
Crafted by members of the National Forum on Early Childhood Program Evaluation and the National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, two initiatives of the Harvard Center, A Science-Based Frame-work for Early Childhood Policy underwent a rigorous review by outside scholars. State legislators attending the August conference welcomed the effort. “When science can be brought to bear on critical issues involving child development, it can give us the unbiased information we need to develop the best policies for our states,” said Melvin Neufeld, a Republican who is Speaker of the House of Representatives in Kansas.
Parents and Teachers Key
Ensuring nurturing experiences early in life is more likely to be effective—and cost-effective—than providing remediation at later ages, the authors conclude. Cost-benefit studies show a strong return on investment for high-quality programs that target vulnerable children, as early as prenatally and as late as age 4.
For copies or further information about the Center on the Developing Child, visit www.developingchild.harvard.edu.
Photograph: Getty Images/MedioImage
is maintained by Development Communications in the Office of Resource
To contact us with suggestions, comments, and questions, please e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright 2007, President and Fellows of Harvard College