Photo by: Pixabay user Olga1205

Negative impacts of burning natural gas and biomass have surpassed coal generation in many states

05/05/2021 | Environmental Research Letters

Read our case study

A new inventory of air pollution impacts from stationary sources over the past decade shows this trend may continue.

Burning natural gas, biomass, and wood now has more negative health impacts than burning coal in many states and is a trend that may continue, according to a study led by our Research Scientist Jonathan Buonocore. Published in Environmental Research Letters with support from RMI, “A decade of the U.S. energy mix transitioning away from coal: historical reconstruction of the reductions in the public health burden of energy” provides the first inventory of the health impacts of each type of fuel burned at stationary sources from 2008-2017, based on available data.

“Our findings show that while there are public health benefits from reducing coal emissions; gas, biomass, and wood are not clean or healthy alternative energy sources. Swapping one polluting fuel source for another is not a pathway to a healthy energy system,” says lead author Jonathan Buonocore Sc.D., a Research Scientist at the Center for Climate, Health, and the Global Environment at the Harvard Chan School. “Wind, solar, and other non-fuel combusting renewable energy are the healthiest energy sources available for generating electricity, powering our factories, and heating our homes.” 

New energy infrastructure that’s being considered now could operate for decades—locking in their health impacts along with greenhouse gas emissions. 

Researchers examined the impact on mortality of tiny particles of pollution called PM2.5 that are emitted outdoors at stationary sources like coal plants, gas plants, industrial boilers, buildings (commercial and residential), and other industries up the oil and gas supply chain. 

Related Media

Key takeaways

  • Fuel consuming stationary sources in 2017 were responsible for an estimated $524 billion to $777 billion in health impacts and 47,000-69,000 premature deaths, 33,000-53,000 of which were due to fuel sources other than coal.
  • As of 2017, gas emissions from stationary sources led to more deaths than coal in at least 19 states (CA, CO, CT, DE, ID, IL, KS, LA, MA, MS, NH, NJ, NV, NY, OR, RI, VA, VT, WA) and D.C.
  • As coal use has decreased, the share of health impacts from stationary sources has risen from gas, wood, and biomass. Together these fuels accounted for an estimated 70-77% of total early deaths from fuel consuming stationary source PM2.5 in 2017.
  • Taken together, biomass and wood have the fastest-growing share of early deaths in the major energy-consuming sectors. In 2008 early deaths attributed to burning biomass and wood accounted for around 14-17% of average total deaths from stationary sources but by 2017, biomass and wood increased to 39-47% of total averaged early deaths.
  • Gas is the second fastest-growing sector. The share of early deaths from gas increased from approximately 11-14% in 2008 to 21% in 2017.
  • Health impacts from coal are decreasing while the share of impacts from gas and wood/biomass are increasing, and this will likely continue beyond 2017. Projections estimate that in 2018, the health impacts of coal and gas were nearly equal — coal remained the most harmful fuel in the electricity sector, while wood/biomass and gas were most harmful in buildings and industrial boilers.
  • The health impacts of these fuels are conservative estimates because they only account for what is emitted outdoors at stationary sources, during combustion. For example, the full life cycle of emissions from gas production and compressor stations are not included. The study only looked at primary and secondary PM2.5 emissions—PM2.5 emissions from precursors (sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and volatile organic compounds)—not ozone, direct NO2 exposure, and exposure to other air toxics, such as benzene and toluene.

State findings on stationary sources

Click through RMI’s interactive map to find the health impact of buildings in your state.

Top 10 states with the most premature deaths from natural gas burned in all stationary sources: New York (1,227), Illinois (1,202), Texas (1,094), California (1,013), Pennsylvania (770), Michigan (495), Oklahoma (473), Ohio (454), Indiana (415), Louisiana (348).

Top 10 states with most premature deaths from air pollution—gas burned in all stationary sectors

Top 10 states with the most premature deaths from natural gas burned in buildings: New York (963), Illinois (682), California (438), Pennsylvania (376), Michigan (307), Ohio (210), New Jersey (203), Massachusetts (148), Maryland (135), Texas (128).

Bar Graph reflecting top 10 states with most premature deaths

Top 10 states with the most premature deaths from all fuels burned in buildings: New York (1,940), Pennsylvania (1,531), California (1,527), Illinois (1,123), New Jersey (1,086), Minnesota (865), Michigan (841), Ohio (833), Massachusetts (749), Maryland (627).

Bar graph with top 10 states

“A decade of the U.S. energy mix transitioning away from coal: historical reconstruction of the reductions in the public health burden of energy,” Jonathan J. Buonocore, Parichehr Salimifard, Drew R. Michanowicz, Joseph G. Allen, Environmental Research Letters, May 5, 2021. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abe74c

Raw state-level data available upon request. Contact Anna Miller, amiller@hsph.harvard.edu.

Study: Regional transportation pact could save more than 1,000 lives

A regional initiative among 12 Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states aimed at reducing carbon emissions from transportation could help avoid about 1,100 deaths and nearly 5,000 asthma cases each year, and could save more than $11 billion in health costs, according to a new analysis.

Read Now

Carbon Standards Re-Examined

Our researchers collaborated with other institutions on a working paper on what EPA’s finalized ACE Rule means for public health. The analysis calls into question the assumptions and predictions used in EPA’s cost-benefit analysis.

Read Now

Weakened mercury controls could lead to health harms

The Trump administration has weakened regulations regarding the release of mercury and other toxic metals from coal- and oil-fired power plants. Environmental and public health experts say the move is an attack on air quality and could harm health—particularly that of children. “What is most disconcerting to me is this administration’s lack of interest in…

Read Now

Public Health Benefits Associated with Mercury Emissions Reductions from U.S. Power Plants

Our new white paper makes a science-based case for why it is appropriate and necessary to regulate mercury emissions from the power sector.

Read Now

2019 Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change: Policy Brief for the U.S.

Every child born today will be affected by climate change. How we respond will shape the health of children across the globe.

Read Now

Where to install renewable energy to get the greatest climate and health benefits in the U.S.

A guide for state and national policymakers designing climate plans and for utility and investor decisions.

Read Now

Many More People Live Closer To Underground Gas Storage Wells Than Previously Thought

An estimated 20,000 homes and 53,000 people in predominantly suburban areas of PA, OH, WV, MI, NY, and CA live within a city block of active underground natural gas storage wells.

Read Now

House Dust in Mining-Impacted Communities May Impact Children's Health

Young children are a particular concern because early exposures to metals commonly found at mining sites are associated with neurodevelopmental deficits.

Read Now

Full Cost Accounting for the Life Cycle of Coal

Life cycle impacts of coal cost the US public a third to over one half a trillion dollars annually.

Read Now

How Dangerous are Underground Natural Gas Storage Wells?

Study explores the risks of aging infrastructure throughout the United States.

Read Now

Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previously thought

Fine particulate pollution from fossil fuel combustion was responsible for one in five early deaths worldwide in 2018, with vulnerable groups at greatest risk.

Read Now

Episode 71: Are Fossil Fuels Really Dying: How Are We Replacing Them? (Environmental & Health Impacts)

Our Research Scientist Jonathan Buonocore unpacks the fossil fuel industry, the alternative options, and the big question: are they really dying out?

Read Now

Fossil Fuel Pollution Kills 8.7 Million a Year, Twice Previous Estimate

Our Director Dr. Aaron Bernstein underscores that fossil fuels are killing millions of people right now.

Read Now

Study: Fossil fuel air pollution linked to 1 in 5 deaths worldwide

“The big takeaway message here is that we have far more to gain from our health than we just realized yesterday from getting off fossil fuels,” —our Director Dr. Aaron Bernstein

Read Now

As world sours on coal, top producer Indonesia tries to sweeten it at home

Our Research Scientist Jonathan Buonocore comments on Indonesia's coal gasification project, saying it would be very difficult to have zero climate impact.

Read Now

New pediatrician network puts spotlight on climate change’s effects on children

As the effects of climate change play out worldwide, pediatricians see the evidence in their offices.

Read Now

The World's First Death Attributed to Air Pollution Could Spark the Change We Need

A young girl in the UK is the first person in the world to have a death certificate that lists air pollution as a cause of death. Our Director Dr. Aaron Bernstein comments on the impact of burning fossil fuels on child health.

Read Now

Working to Death

Our Interim Director Dr. Bernstein interviews about how climate change impacts worker health.

Read Now

Cracking down on soot pollution could save thousands of lives—but the EPA won’t do it

There’s overwhelming evidence that air pollution is a serious public health problem, says our Research Scientist Jonathan Buonocore.

Read Now

Study: Air quality warnings reduce mortality rates

A new study by our Research Scientist Jonathan Buonocore analyzes how air quality warnings can benefit health.

Read Now