Photo by: iStock / milehightraveler

Pennsylvania setback regulations for fracking do not prevent setback incidents

04/28/2021 | Energy Policy

The Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Act (Act 13) signed in 2012 did not significantly alter how unconventional natural gas (UNG) wells were sited in relation to nearby buildings, often due to exemptions, according to a study led by our Visiting Scientist Drew Michanowicz. This results in wells placed within PA’s setback distance (500 ft.) – a distance that has previously been found to not be protective against routine exposures to toxic substances such as benzene, hydrogen sulfide, and PM2.5 from fracking. Published in Energy Policy, The effect of Pennsylvania’s 500 ft. surface setback regulation on siting unconventional natural gas wells near buildings: an interrupted time-series analysis” is the first study to look at the effectiveness of Pennsylvania’s statewide setback regulations and identify the potential risks and exposure pathways for people living near fracking or UNG wells.

Setbacks are the land-zoning regulations intended to physically separate industrial activity from places that merit protection like homes, schools, hospitals, and surface water. UNG extraction often brings activity to these places that are not historically seen as industrial, such as suburban areas, and brings hazards and harms that are not well understood. 

Key findings:

The effectiveness of setback policies depends on how many opportunities there are for exemptions from siting restrictions.

    • Following Act 13, which increased UNG well-to-building setback requirement from 200 ft. to 500 ft., a total of 371 setback incidents were observed likely due to pre-existing well pads that were exempted from the regulation (35%) and a combination of landowner consent and regulatory distance variances rather than encroaching building development.
    • The majority (up to 65%) of setback incidents in PA were likely due to landowner consent waivers and/or operator requested distance variances.
    • One out of every 13.7 UNG wells drilled in PA exhibited a setback incident after the passage of Act 13.

Exempting pre-existing well pads from new setback regulations has clear implications for human health and safety.

    • A possible 46% decrease in the setback incident rate could have been achieved by outlawing new setback incidents on the 2,049 pre-Act 13 well pads.
    • Inequities could persist unchecked due to the ambiguity of the exemption approval process combined with a confidential mineral rights leasing process.

Policy recommendations for new or amended setback regulations:

    • New or amended setback regulations should
      • Revisit exemptions and where warranted, impose additional mitigation measures to ensure setback regulations provide adequate protections for health and safety as intended.
      • Include additional protective mitigation measures when an existing well pad is altered and/or require both regulatory approval and landowner consent.
    • Regulators could routinely track and report well siting exemption rates and rationales and if warranted, consider changes to setback rules to narrow exemptions that are used too frequently.
    • Regulators could ensure better landowner consent provisions; for instance, by requiring that the operator demonstrate to the landowner and the regulator that there is no alternative siting possible before landowner consent can be obtained.
    • Regulators could increase transparency by making setback exemption permits publicly available online alongside other commonly reported well permit information.

“The effect of Pennsylvania’s 500 ft. surface setback regulation on siting unconventional natural gas wells near buildings: an interrupted time-series analysis,” Drew R. Michanowicz, Jonathan J. Buonocore, Katherine E. Konschnik, Shaun A. Goho, Aaron S. Bernstein, Energy Policy, April 28, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112298 

Related media:

Study: Regional transportation pact could save more than 1,000 lives

A regional initiative among 12 Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states aimed at reducing carbon emissions from transportation could help avoid about 1,100 deaths and nearly 5,000 asthma cases each year, and could save more than $11 billion in health costs, according to a new analysis.

Read Now

Carbon Standards Re-Examined

Our researchers collaborated with other institutions on a working paper on what EPA’s finalized ACE Rule means for public health. The analysis calls into question the assumptions and predictions used in EPA’s cost-benefit analysis.

Read Now

Weakened mercury controls could lead to health harms

The Trump administration has weakened regulations regarding the release of mercury and other toxic metals from coal- and oil-fired power plants. Environmental and public health experts say the move is an attack on air quality and could harm health—particularly that of children. “What is most disconcerting to me is this administration’s lack of interest in…

Read Now

Public Health Benefits Associated with Mercury Emissions Reductions from U.S. Power Plants

Our new white paper makes a science-based case for why it is appropriate and necessary to regulate mercury emissions from the power sector.

Read Now

2019 Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change: Policy Brief for the U.S.

Every child born today will be affected by climate change. How we respond will shape the health of children across the globe.

Read Now

Where to install renewable energy to get the greatest climate and health benefits in the U.S.

A guide for state and national policymakers designing climate plans and for utility and investor decisions.

Read Now

Many More People Live Closer To Underground Gas Storage Wells Than Previously Thought

An estimated 20,000 homes and 53,000 people in predominantly suburban areas of PA, OH, WV, MI, NY, and CA live within a city block of active underground natural gas storage wells.

Read Now

House Dust in Mining-Impacted Communities May Impact Children's Health

Young children are a particular concern because early exposures to metals commonly found at mining sites are associated with neurodevelopmental deficits.

Read Now

Full Cost Accounting for the Life Cycle of Coal

Life cycle impacts of coal cost the US public a third to over one half a trillion dollars annually.

Read Now

How Dangerous are Underground Natural Gas Storage Wells?

Study explores the risks of aging infrastructure throughout the United States.

Read Now

Trump's Roll Back of Science with Gina McCarthy

Our Director, Gina McCarthy, speaks on the rollback of the Clean Power Plan and this Administration's attack on science on the Outrage and Optimism Podcast.

Read Now

Trump Administration Weakens Climate Plan to Help Coal Plants Stay Open

Gina McCarthy speaks to NPR regarding the Trump Administration EPA's new Affordable Clean Energy rule which supports coal power plants.

Read Now

Harvard study uses new method to show how close residents live to Aliso Canyon-type wells

Study finds 20,000 homes and 53,000 people in predominantly suburban areas of PA, OH, WV, MI, NY, and CA live within a city block of active underground natural gas storage wells.

Read Now

We helped write the Clean Power Plan, and Trump's do-nothing replacement is an outrage

The Trump administration is dismantling the EPA's core science, regulation, and enforcement functions, write our Director Gina McCarthy and co-authors in a powerful Newsweek op-ed.

Read Now

New EPA rule weakens Obama-era plan to cut coal plant emissions

A new rule from the Trump administration undercuts Obama-era efforts to limit emissions from coal-fired power plants that contribute to climate change. The Obama administration’s “Clean Power Plan,” which never went into effect because of a court challenge, would have required states to meet specific targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, with…

Read Now

House Panel Talks Health Effects of Climate Change

Our Co-director Dr. Aaron Bernstein testified to Congress about the impact of climate change on children's health.

Read Now

Climate change is making ground-level ozone pollution worse

This is bad news for those of us who need to breathe. Co-Director Aaron Bernstein weighs in.

Read Now

Public Comments Opposing EPA’s Proposal to Undermine Mercury Standards for Coal-fired Power Plants

Our Energy & Health team joined Harvard Law School to submit comments on EPA's proposed rollback of the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards.

Read Now

How oil and gas projects could be detrimental to the environment

What do more gas and oil energy projects mean for us? Our Director Gina McCarthy breaks down the health, environmental, and political implications of energy deregulation.

Read Now

Impacts of Rolling Back Mercury and Carbon Standards

Explores results of recent studies highlighting the potential impact of two EPA proposals—rolling back the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) and replacing the Clean Power Plan with the Affordable Clean Energy rule (ACE).

Read Now