It is a decision no mother should have to make: choosing to protect her health or that of her baby. Yet that deadly predicament has appeared to arise for pregnant women infected with HIV in developing countries, just as a major global push begins to make basic lifesaving antiretroviral therapy and prophylaxis available to more people.
HIV-infected mothers in developing countries can take a single-dose AIDS drug during labor to block HIV transmission to their infants without jeopardizing their own treatment outcomes—as long as they can wait at least six months before beginning the standard therapy, report Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) researchers Max Essex, Shahin Lockman, and their colleagues.
The heartbreaking dilemma centers around a drug called nevirapine. A single dose to the mother and to the newborn has been shown to protect nearly half the babies from acquiring HIV infection during birth. But it takes only one point mutation for the sloppily replicating virus to become resistant to nevirapine and other drugs of its type. The same dose that can prevent HIV infection in the infant can make the virus resistant and the drugs ineffective for treating full-blown AIDS in the mother.
A new study may relieve women of this life-or-death quandary. If given six months or more after childbirth, the international standard triple-drug combination, which includes nevirapine, works as well in women who received a single dose during labor as it does in those who received a placebo, reported Lockman and her colleagues in January in the New England Journal of Medicine.
“You don’t have to pit mother against baby,” says Lynne Mofenson, branch chief of pediatric, adolescent, and maternal AIDS at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, which funded the study. “You can both prevent the transmission and take care of maternal health.”
The analysis narrows the crucial window of clinical drug resistance in mothers who take the single-dose prophylactic during labor. In the study, antiretroviral drugs failed to block the virus from replicating in nearly half of the women who started AIDS treatment within six months, compared to helping most of the women who received a placebo in childbirth.
“The results translate into very clear policy for how to treat AIDS in new mothers who receive nevirapine to protect their infants,” says senior author Max Essex, the Mary Woodard Lasker Professor of Health Sciences at HSPH and director of both the School’s AIDS Initiative and the Botswana-Harvard AIDS Partnership for Research and Education. “If you can wait six months, do so. If not, treat only with combinations of drugs that do not contain nevirapine or nevirapine-related drugs.”
Even better, Mofenson says, identify pregnant women who need combination therapy and start treatment right away, as per international guidelines. This way, preventive single-dose nevirapine goes only to women who do not require therapy until much later, when viral resistance fades and the nevirapine-containing multidrug regimen is more likely to work.
Building Global Policy
The study marks the beginning of a shift in thinking about HIV/AIDS care in developing countries from quick emergency fixes to longer term implications, Rodriguez says. Since Lockman first reported preliminary results in late 2005, others have reported similar findings in smaller observational studies in Thailand, Zimbabwe, and Zambia. Lockman’s study is the first of the bunch published in a peer-reviewed journal. “It is a landmark study—powerful and informative,” says Rodriguez, who, like Lockman, is an assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School.
In a more tentative finding, Lockman’s paper heightens concerns about nevirapine resistance in infants: Therapy failed in more drug-exposed infants than in those who had received a placebo. These first data on infant resistance need to be confirmed in larger studies before making new health policy, says Lockman, but individual practitioners may be more comfortable treating exposed infants with more costly protease inhibitors, if possible.
Breast Milk or Formula?
When mothers and infants also received AZT, the first paper in the series reported, the protective effect of nevirapine worked just as well when given only to the newborn infant at birth and not to the mother in labor—an alternative strategy that can safeguard health in the baby without risking nevirapine resistance in the mother. Surprisingly, 75 percent of the transmissions occurred in utero, before the nevirapine was administered to mother or child. This finding supported a decision by Botswana health leaders to provide antiretroviral drugs earlier in pregnancy, at week 28 instead of week 34. The study, led by HSPH’s Roger Shapiro, an assistant professor of immunology and infectious diseases, was published in June 2006 in the journal AIDS.
The second article found a higher death rate among formula-fed babies, even though they had fewer HIV infections at seven months than breast-fed infants. The relatively clean water in Botswana suggests that the formula strategy could inadvertently cause even more deaths in areas where access to clean water is more problematic. The paper, by lead author Ibou Thior, who until recently was the site director of the Botswana-Harvard Partnership in Gaborone, was published in August 2006 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Botswana has one of the highest HIV infection rates in the world, with about one-third of adults infected. Most of the infections are due to the most common HIV-1 subtype in southern Africa, clade C, HSPH researchers say. Globally, HIV disproportionately affects women: Three-quarters of young Africans with HIV are women ages 15 to 24. Last year, an estimated 530,000 infants became newly infected with HIV, mostly in developing countries.
Even as the researchers urge more effective prevention and treatment strategies in Botswana, where more than two-thirds of infected pregnant women receive intervention, they face the reality that a similar proportion of women and infants in Africa receive nothing for HIV/AIDS. See graphic
“It’s almost impossible to grasp the scale of these questions that affect the lives of millions of women and men and infants worldwide,” Lockman says. “It’s the biggest pandemic in the history of the world.”
Improving Best Practices
The Mashi study started before any treatment was available in Botswana, but things quickly changed, prompting several protocol modifications. All Mashi infants also began receiving nevirapine after a Thailand-based HSPH team led by Research Associate Marc Lallemant reported that AZT and nevirapine were better than AZT alone at preventing mother-to-child transmission. And as soon as Botswana became the first African country to launch a free national antiretroviral therapy program in one locale, the study team added the same treatment for study participants in all four locales. Thinking ahead, Lockman and her colleagues prospectively designed a new study question into the protocol change—a move that led to her team’s latest findings.
“You’re always walking an ethical tightrope to make sure you’re answering a question that is relevant and providing the best standard of care,” says Lockman. “You absolutely have to strive to do the right thing. Every effort should be made to provide effective combination treatment for HIV-infected women who need it for their own health, whenever they need it, including during pregnancy.”
Carol Cruzan Morton writes frequently for HSPH’s twice-monthly newsletter, Public Health NOW. This article originally appeared in Focus, the news-letter of HSPH, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, and Harvard Medical School.
is maintained by Development Communications in the Office of Resource
To contact us with suggestions, comments, and questions, please e-mail: email@example.com
Copyright 2007, President and Fellows of Harvard College